The ICO madness goes mainstream and attracts regulators

The ICO madness goes mainstream and attracts regulators

Since we started writing about the topic of ICO’s we’ve been inundated with interesting projects hoping to do an initial token offering.

It seems like if I go to a conference, there are multiple panels on the topic (as there was last weekend at TechSauce in Bangkok). If I look at my phone, multiple group chats are going on about the benefits and potential perils. I am waiting for the day when I see an ICO billboard driving down the street.

However, the regulators are starting to take notice as well.

This last week we had a piece of news from the SEC, who released an investigative report about the DAO – which they declared was a security, but at this point, they were taking no action.

The takeaway I got from this report was that some tokens are securities, and others are not. This is something we really already knew before, but it’s helpful to hear a regulator clarify on this point.

An ICO has definite risks for both investors and proprietors. Investors need to evaluate if the token has any intrinsic use case they are interested in (if it’s a ‘for use’ token). And if it’s a security token, investors need to assess whether it will appreciate in value.

I also came across this very nice spreadsheet to help entrepreneurs evaluate whether their token may be considered a security, or not. In particular, this helps evaluate the token against the “Howey Test” which is the test used at the federal level in the US to evaluate a security.

I manipulated the numbers a little (since this is an interpretation of laws and by no means, legal advice or the laws themselves). I also added a section to include risk capital test – the test applied in some states including California.

In other news, we also heard from the Singaporean regulator MAS on token sales. Previously, on March 13th, 2014, the regulator wrote that virtual currencies were not regulated per se, and they are not securities

Now, from 2014 the position was very clear – tokens are not securities. Today’s memo states that tokens may be considered securities, depending on the individual circumstances. Now, this doesn’t officially change anything (a token could have been a security before) but clarifies and specifies the point that tokens may at times, fall under securities regulation – basically the same as the SEC ruling.


Here is the report from MAS in its entirety.

Would you like to receive the Flag Theory Weekly Letter in your email?

Subscribe to the Flag  Theory Weekly Letter

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. You can Change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we will assume you are OK to continue. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • enEnglish
  • cnChinese
  • ja日本語